Diplomatically speaking, he's a nut

By Mark Steyn 
December 11, 2005
Orange County Register
Original Source: http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/opinion/atoz/article_882455.php

Good news! On Thursday, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, who recently called for Israel to be wiped off the map, moderated his position. In a spirit of statesmanlike compromise, he now wants Israel wiped off the map of the Middle East and wiped onto the map of Europe.
Some European countries insist on saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in furnaces, President Ahmadinejad told Iranian TV viewers. Although we don't accept this claim, if we suppose it is true, he added sportingly, if European countries claim that they have killed Jews in World War II, why don't they provide the Zionist regime with a piece of Europe? Germany and Austria can provide the regime with two or three provinces for this regime to establish itself, and the issue will be resolved. You offer part of Europe, and we will support it.
Big of you. It's the perfect solution to the Middle East peace process: out of sight, out of mind. And given that President Ahmadinejad's out of his mind, we're already halfway there.
So let's see: We have a Holocaust denier who wants to relocate an entire nation to another continent, and he happens to be head of the world's newest nuclear state. (They're not 100 percent fully fledged operational, but, happily for them, they can drag out the pseudo-negotiations with the European Union until they are. And Washington certainly won't do anything, because, after all, if we're not 100 percent certain they've got WMD - which we won't be until there's a big smoking crater live on CNN - it would be just another Bushitlerburton lie to get us into another war for oil, right?)
So how does the United States react? Well, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that the comments of President Ahmadinejad further underscore our concerns about the regime.
Really? But wait, the world's superpower wasn't done yet. The State Department moved to a two-adjective alert and described President Ahmadinejad's remarks as appalling and reprehensible. They certainly don't inspire hope among any of us in the international community that the government of Iran is prepared to engage as a responsible member of that community, spokesperson Adam Ereli said.
You don't say. Ahmadinejad was speaking in the holy city of Mecca, head office of the religion of peace, during a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. There were 50-something other heads of government in town. How many do you think took their Iranian colleague to task?
Well, what's new? But, that being so, it would be heartening if the rest of the world could muster a serious response to the guy. How one pines for a plain-spoken tell-it-like-it-is fellow like, say, former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali? As he memorably said of Iran, It's a totalitarian regime. Oh, no, wait. He said that about the United States. On Iran, he's as impeccably circumspect and discreet as the State Department.
Diplomatic language is one of the last holdovers of the predemocratic age. It belongs to a time when international relations were conducted exclusively between a handful of eminent representatives of European dynasties.
Today it's all out in the open - President Ahmaddasanatta proposed his not-quite-final solution for Israel on TV. McLellan and Ereli likewise gave their response on TV. So the language of international relations is no longer merely the private code of diplomats but part of the public discourse - and, if the government of the United States learns anything from the past four years, it surely ought to be that there's a price to be paid for not waging the war as effectively in the psychological arenas as in the military one.
What does it mean when one party can talk repeatedly about the liquidation of an entire nation, and the other party responds that this further underscores our concerns, as if he'd been listening to an EU trade representative propose increasing some tariff by half a percent?
Well, it emboldens the bully. It gives him an advantage, like the punk who swears and sprawls over half the seats in the subway car while the other riders try not to catch his eye. The political thugs certainly understand the power of psychological intimidation.
Look at Saddam Hussein in court, so confident in his sneering dismissal of judge and witnesses that he's generating big pro-Baathist demonstrations in Tikrit. I was struck by his complaint that the real terrorism was that he hadn't been given a change in underpants in three days. I hope that's true. It requires enormous strength of will on the part of free societies to bring blustering, cocksure thugs down to size, even after we've overthrown them and kicked them out of the presidential palace. In Iran, President Ahmaddamytree figures that half the world likes his Jew proposals, and the rest isn't prepared to do more than offer a few objections phrased in the usual thin diplo-pablum.
Look at the broader picture. The State Department's Ereli noted that President Ahmageddon's comments appear to be a consistent pattern of rhetoric that is both hostile and out of touch with values that the rest of us in the international community live by.
Is that even true? That the Iranian president is out of touch with the values of the international community? The Hudson Institute's lively Eye On The U.N. Web site had an interesting photograph of how the international community marked Nov. 29 - the annual International Day of Solidarity With The Palestinian People. Kofi Annan and other bigwigs sat on a platform with a map flanked by the Palestinian and U.N. flags. The map showed Palestine but no Israel. The United Nations, in other words, has done cartographically what Iran wants to do in more incendiary fashion: It's wiped Israel off the map.
There has always been a slightly post-modern quality to sovereignty in the transnational age: We pretend the Syrian foreign minister is no different from the New Zealand foreign minister and in so doing we vastly inflate the status of the former at the expense of the latter. But with President Ahmadinejad we're going way beyond that. If a genocidal fantasist is acceptable in polite society, we'll soon find ourselves dealing with a genocidal realist.