After Bhutto's Killing, UN Statements Watered Down, Omitting Need for Speed and Law
By Matthew Russell Lee 
December 28, 2007
The Inner City Press	
Original Source: http://www.innercitypress.com/bhuttounprst122807.html
UNITED NATIONS, December 28 -- In the hours after Benazir Bhutto was killed, the 15 members of the UN Security Council negotiated and agreed to a Presidential Statement of condemnation. A sixteenth country was consulted: Pakistan. According to Council diplomats involved in the negotiations, among the changes made before the final Presidential Statement was issued was the omission of any temporal reference in the Council's statement of the need to bring perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism to justice. The proposal was to say this should be done as soon as possible, but this was omitted, apparently to make it less likely that the matter could be brought back before the Council if the investigation is too slow or otherwise not credible.  
            Before these Security Council negotiations, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had issued a http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=2933 statement, including a
call for the perpetrators to be brought to justice as soon as possible. I convey my heartfelt condolences to Mrs. Bhutto's family, her colleagues and to the people of Pakistan. While strongly urging for calm and restraint to be maintained at this difficult time, I call on all Pakistanis to work together for peace and national unity.
            In the Council, it was suggested that the Presidential Statement should track Ban Ki-moon's http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=2933 already-issued statement. But issue was taken with the phrase as soon as possible and peace -- international peace and security being the legal hook for the Council to send peacekeepers or investigators, as in Lebanon, to a country. Following the assassination in Beirut of http://www.innercitypress.com/scso053007.html Rafiq Hariri, the Security Council set up an International Commission to investigate, and is now setting up a tribunal in The Hague. Diplomats involved in the negotiation Thursday of the Council's Presidential Statement, dismissive of the post-negotiation http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/stakeout/2007/so071227pm2.rm?start=00:02:19 comments on camera of Pakistan's Deputy Permanent Representative Farukh Amil, opined to Inner City Press that the government of Pervez Musharraf wants to forestall any outside inquiry or oversight, even any language that could help bring his administration to the attention of the Security Council again. 
http://www.innercitypress.com/bhutto1.jpg \* MERGEFORMATINET
Benazir Bhutto with supporters and cameras, UNSC Presidential Statement not shown
            When asked about the phrase as soon as possible, which is in the Secretary-General's statement but did not make it into the Council's Presidential Statement, Pakistan's Deputy Permanent Representative Farukh Amil http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/stakeout/2007/so071227pm2.rm?start=00:02:19 said I don't understand the question, and then not at all, the statement was prepared and done very smoothly. A journalist also asked about reservations Pakistan might have had with the tribute to former Prime Minister Bhutto. The real question, though, concerns the omission of those fighting for democracy and rule of law.  
            While the http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sc9217.doc.htm final Presidential Statement offers a tribute to former Prime Minister Bhutto, it had been proposed to also mention those fighting for democracy and the rule of law. But this too was omitted, apparently under the theory that it might embolden and even empower those questioning the rule of Pervez Musharraf. One is left with a watered down statement, and ever-multiplying questions.