On Gold-Trading UN Peacekeepers, Zero Tolerance is Null and Void, Lute as Security Chief?
By Matthew Russell Lee
July 7, 2008
The Inner City Press 
Original Source: http://www.innercitypress.com/un3oiosmonuc070708.html
UNITED NATIONS, July 7 -- When confronted by scandal, the UN pledges action, that those responsible will be disciplined. But when, months later, there is no discipline but only a warning, the UN has nothing to say. This is what has happened with the involvement by Indian peacekeepers in the gold trade in the Congo. 
  Even the UN's whitewashed investigation found that three peacekeepers were involved. They were referred to the Indian military for discipline. Over the weekend, it emerged that warnings are all they will get. 
  Monday at the UN, Inner City Press asked the spokesperson for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon if he and the UN think these warnings are enough.  Inner City Press had previously asked Ban about precisely this UN Mission in the Congo gold (and guns) scandal, and Ban said that the case would be pursued, including by Inga Britt Ahlenius' Office of Internal Oversight Services. One would have expected OIOS and Ban's Office to proactively respond to decision not to discipline. Monday, however, it was only in response to Inner City Press' question that Ban's spokesperson said that every time we have a disciplinary action, it's taken by the country where the peacekeepers come from.
  
   But in this case, no disciplinary action was taken. Inner City Press followed up, last time that she was here, Jane Holl Lute said 'we are very encouraged by what the Governments are doing to discipline the people we refer to them.'  So this is a kind of a high-profile case involving trading of gold for guns with rebels.  Is there anything the UN can do to make sure the peacekeepers get more than a warning?
    The spokesperson did not address Ms. Lute's now dubious comments, rather stating that except that we keep on talking to Member States about that, the countries contributing troops, there is not much we can do beyond that, beyond putting pressure.
   But what pressure? The UN has already publicly implied that it need peacekeepers so badly that it does not want to require disciplinary action. 

  Inner City Press asked if the failure to impose any discipline should impact on the UN's future acceptance of peacekeeping from the country that neglects to discipline. The spokesperson finally announced the only ramification of the scandal of UN peacekeepers involved in gold trading: these three individuals will not work for the UN again. Video here, from Minute 12:46.
  Is this what is meant by zero tolerance at the UN?  That was Jane Holl Lute's phrase, at press conference after press conference: zero tolerance. Now, it's said, Ms. Lute is being mentioned to replace David Veness as the head of UN security. Given the lack of follow-through on peacekeeper discipline, and her role in steering a $250 million no-bid contract to Lockheed Martin, such a move would send all the wrong messages. We'll see.
 In other UN post news, Inner City Press now reports for the second time the resignation of Assistant Secretary General Yohannes Mengesha. Why the Secretariat has not seen fit to announce the news is not yet known. There are musical chairs afoot. The post vacated by Angela Kane, ASG in the Department of Political Affairs, is said to be lusted after by the wife of USG Terje Roed Larsen, who otherwise faces return to Oslo by the Norwegian foreign ministry. 
   Others say that the Political ASG slot might be kept empty, in belated response to the outcry when UNCTAD's vacant ASG slot was used to move Jan Beagle from New York to Geneva. Ms. Kane's old slot might now be used to solve, or at least postpone, that previous gaffe. We'll see.