An Anti-Israel Extremist Seeks Revenge Through Goldstone Report

By Alan Dershowitz
2/12/2010
Huffington Post
Original Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/an-anti-israel-extremist_b_460187.html

When Irish Colonel Travers eagerly accepted an appointment to the Goldstone Commission, he was hellbent on revenge against Israel based on paranoid fantasies and hard left anti-Israel propaganda. He actually believed, as he put it in a recent interview, that so many Irish soldiers had been killed by Israelis, with a significant number who were taken out deliberately and shot (in southern Lebanon.) This is of course complete and utter fantasy, but it was obviously part of Colonel Travers bigoted reality. 

Travers came to the job having already made up his mind not to believe anything Israel said and to accept everything Hamas put forward. For example, Israel produced hard photographic evidence that Gaza mosques were used to store rockets and other weapons. Other photographs taken by journalists also proved what everybody now acknowledges to be true: namely that Hamas, as its leaders frequently boasted, routinely use mosques as military munitions depots. When confronted with this photographic evidence, Travers said I don't believe the photographs. Of course he doesn't since they don't comport with his politically correct and ideologically skewed worldview. This is what he had previously said about why he didn't believe that Hamas used the mosques to store weapons:

We also found no evidence that mosques were used to store munitions. Those charges reflect Western perceptions in some quarters that Islam is a violent religion....If I were a Hamas operative the last place I'd store munitions would be in a mosque. It's not secure, is very visible, and would probably be pre-targeted by Israeli surveillance. There are a [sic] many better places to store munitions.
But that is exactly what Hamas did, despite Travers' insistence on paraphrasing Groucho Mark's famous quip, Who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes?

Most disturbing, however, was Travers' categorical rejection of Israel's claim that it attacked Gaza only after enduring thousands of anti-personnel rockets intended to target Israeli civilians, mainly schoolchildren. In fact, Hamas rockets hit several schools, though fortunately the teachers had dismissed the students just before the rockets would have killed dozens, perhaps hundreds, of them. This is what Travers said about Hamas rockets.

Hamas rockets had ceased being fired into Israel and not only that but Hamas sought a continuation of the ceasefire... and Israel said no.

Travers then claimed that Hamas had fired no rockets at Israel in the month leading up to the Israeli invasion:

...the number of rockets that had been fired into Israel in the month preceding their operations was something like two. The Hamas rockets had ceased being fired into Israel and not only that but Hamas sought a continuation of the ceasefire. Two had been fired from Gaza, but they are likely to have been fired by dissident groups, [i.e. groups that were violating a Hamas order not to fire rockets].

Again, Travers' rendition defies the historical record and tells us more about Travers than it does about what actually provoked Israel into finally taking action to protect a million civilians who were in range of the thousands of Hamas rockets that had been fired at its civilians. In fact Israel complied with the cease fire under whose terms Israel reserved the right to engage in self-defense actions such as attacking terrorists who were in the process of firing rockets at its civilians. 

Just before the hostilities began, Israel offered Hamas a carrot and a stick: it reopened a checkpoint to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. It had closed the point of entry after the checkpoint had been targeted by Gazan rockets Israel's prime minister, Ehud Olmert, also issued a stern, final warning to Hamas that unless it stopped the rockets, there would be a full-scale military response.

This is the way Reuters reported it:

Israel reopened border crossings with the Gaza Strip on Friday, a day after Prime Minister warned militants there to stop firing rockets or they would pay a heavy price. Despite the movement of relief supplies, militants fired about a dozen rockets and mortar shafts from Gaza at Israel on Friday. One accidentally struck a house in Gaza, killing two Palestinian sisters, ages 5 and 13.

Despite the opening of the crossings, the Hamas rockets continued--not none, not something like two, but many--and Israel kept its word, implementing a targeted air attack against Hamas facilities and combatants. 

Not surprisingly, Travers said that he rejected...entirely Israel's claim that its attack on Gaza was based on self-defense. Instead, he compared Israel's attack on Hamas to the unprovoked Fascist bombing of Guirnica. 

Travers has repeatedly claimed that no substantive critique of the [Goldstone] report has been received. This is an out and out lie. I have read dozens of substantive critiques and have written a 49-page one myself (www.alandershowitz.com/goldstone.pdf.) The truth is that Travers has studiously ignored and refused to respond to these critiques. And of course he blames everything on Jewish lobbyists.

Nor was Travers the only member of the commission with predetermined views and an anti-Israel agenda. Christine Chinken had already declared Israel guilty of war crimes before seeing any evidence. Hina Jilani had also condemned Israel before her appointment to the group, and then said that it would be very cruel to not give credence to [the] voices of the victims, apparently without regard to whether they were telling the truth. And then there is Richard Goldstone, who told friends that he too took the job with an agenda, which he says was to help Israel! Why any reasonable person would pay any attention to a report written by four people who had prejudged the evidence and came to their jobs with agendas and biases is beyond comprehension.