LINK TO THIS H EADING

ANNEX 3-60 TARGETING

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF LOAC AND THEIR TARGETING IMPLICATIONS
Last Updated: 10 Jan 14 LOAC rests on four fundamental principles that are inherent to all targeting decisions: military necessity, unnecessary suffering, proportionality and distinction (discrimination). Military Necessity. Is this target a valid military objective? Military necessity acknowledges that attacks can be made against targets, but only targets that are valid military objectives. In this case, the term "military objective" in this context comes from the description in Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention that describes military objectives as "... [T]hose objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage." Though the United States is not a signatory to the Additional Protocol, it views this definition as an accurate restatement of customary international law that we recognize and with which we comply.1 For example, a residential home does not usually make an effective contribution to military action so is not usually a valid military target. However, a residence may become a valid military target if an adversary is using it for military purposes (such as a military command post, a fighting position, etc.). In that case, the purpose or nature of the objective has been changed by the adversary's actions and if a definite military advantage will be achieved through targeting the residence then it may be attacked. Unnecessary Suffering (Humanity). May the use of a particular weapon used to strike a target cause unnecessary suffering? This principle is based in the Hague Conventions restrictions against using arms, projectiles, or materials calculated to cause unnecessary suffering and forbids the infliction of unnecessary suffering, injury or destruction not actually necessary for legitimate military purposes. All weapons in the US inventory are permissible for use unless otherwise restricted by higher authority for operational reasons. These weapons have been reviewed to determine if they comply with the LOAC and have been determined not to cause unnecessary suffering when

1

The word "objective" as used above should not be confused with the definition "objective" in JP 5-0: "The clearly defined, decisive, and attainable goal- towards which every--operation is directed."

used in the manner in which they were designed. However, this principle also prohibits using an otherwise lawful weapon in a manner that causes unnecessary suffering. An example of causing unnecessary suffering would be to modify munitions to disperse glass projectiles to complicate providing medical treatment to the wounded. The bottom line is to use the weapon/munitions as they are designed. Proportionality. Does the military advantage to be gained from striking a target outweigh the anticipated incidental civilian loss of life and property if this target is struck? This requires the expected loss of civilian life and damage to civilian property incidental to attack not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from striking the target. Planners and commanders should weigh the expected military advantages to be gained from affecting a target against the incidental loss or injury to civilians and the damage or destruction of civilian property. The anticipated military advantage refers to the advantage from those actions considered as a whole, and not only from isolated or particular actions. A "military advantage" is not just a tactical gain, but can span the spectrum of tactical, operational or strategic levels. For example, an armored vehicle used in combat is located at a school. The vehicle is a valid target. However, destroying the vehicle with certain types of munitions may place lives and safety of nearby non-combatants in jeopardy. The potential for injury to non-combatants should help guide the choice of lethal and/or nonlethal capabilities chosen against the vehicle. Distinction (Discrimination). Have we distinguished between combatants and noncombatants; have we distinguished between military objectives and protected property or places? This principle, based on customary international law, requires parties to direct operations only against combatants and military objectives. It prohibits indiscriminate attacks which are attacks not directed at specific military objectives, those that employ a method or means of combat that cannot be directed at a specific military objective and those that employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited. For example: Dropping munitions--guided or not--in a residential area without regard to whether there are combatants or military objectives in the area simply because there may be adversary forces there would be an indiscriminate attack. The use of gravityguided munitions (non-precision) against enemy combatants or military objectives is not of itself an indiscriminate attack.